United States v. D'AnDre Lampkins, David D. Reed and Stephen D. Bright

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “it makes no sense to claim that one is a minor participant in one’s own conduct”
• court did not abuse discretion in concluding that probative value of the evidence was not outweighed by prejudice where court gave a careful limiting instruction
• sufficient evidence of No. 01-4245 3 conspiracy where runner discussed drug deals and ex- changed drugs and cash
• “[A] prosecutor may permissibly strike a prospective juror on the grounds that close relatives or friends have been convicted of the very crime at issue.”
• “it makes no sense to claim that one is a minor participant in one’s own conduct”
• “[A] prosecutor may permissibly strike a prospective juror on the grounds that close relatives or friends have been convicted of the very crime at issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).