Skip to main content
· 1/5/1900

United States v. Dana

Citations

  • 99 F. 433
  • 39 C.C.A. 590
  • 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4153

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • cost is relevant in determining propriety of back-pay award under Manhart and Norris rationale

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lacombe, Shipman, Wallace

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.