United States v. Dan Thanh Nguyen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence of a third party’s schemes to dupe other individuals was irrelevant to corroborate testimony that the defendant had also been duped by this third party
• explaining that the fruits of already-committed fraud were likely to still be in suspect’s possession
• explaining that the fruits of already-committed fraud were likely to still be in suspect’s possession
• granting trial court wide discretion to consider indices of English proficiency to determine whether defendant is entitled to interpreter
• the trial court’s discretion whether to grant or 8 deny a motion to continue “is at its zenith when the issue . . . is raised close to the trial date.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).