United States v. Dan Reed

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that where the record clearly demonstrates that it would be implausible for the defendant to not have known his felony status, a Rehaif error does not affect his substantial rights
• applying Rehaif to the review of a pre-Rehaif conviction challenged for an insufficient indictment and evidence
• considering the entire record in conducting the reasonable-probability plain-error inquiry, where the defendant alleged Rehaif- related trial error
• reviewing a new challenge to an indictment and conviction based on Rehaif for plain error
• reviewing a newly-available Rehaif argument for plain error
• reviewing a newly-available Rehaif argument for plain error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).