United States v. Dan Anderson, United States of America v. Tosun Ates Yoruk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The effects of a drug, no matter how alarming, are wholly irrelevant to the only issue in this case, which is whether [the defendants] participated in a conspiracy to import marijuana.”
• ‘‘under the unique circumstances of this case [in which the codefendant preserved his claim and the defendant was equally harmed] it would be a manifest injustice to allow [the defendant’s] conviction to stand while ordering a new trial for [his codefendant]’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).