Skip to main content
· 12/19/1962

United States v. Damrow

Citations

  • 211 F. Supp. 615
  • 11 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 360
  • 1962 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5220

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • performing a cross-check using the percentage of recovery method
  • stating, in approving fee request, “[i]mportantly, there were no objections”
  • accepting a lodestar multiplier of 1.35

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kerr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.