Skip to main content
· 1/25/1994

United States v. Dale Thomas Johns

Citations

  • 15 F.3d 740
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 1198
  • 1994 WL 17013

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that once an individual has met the burden of proving 16 disability, “the Commissioner must prove that a claimant previously adjudged disabled has 17 recovered sufficiently to return to work.”
  • allowing generalized testimony of an expert who had not met the victim and who made no comment as to the victim’s credibility
  • stating abuse of trust adjustment is entitled to great deference and will not be disturbed unless clearly erroneous
  • upholding ALJ’s credibility determination when he pointed out 16 numerous lab results that contradicted his subjective complaints
  • allowing an expert to “describe[] emotional and psychological traits” of abused children as long as she did “not state an opinion that sexual abuse has in fact occurred”
  • explaining how a defendant had committed sexual abuse under 18 U.S.C. § 2242(1) in part by using “his position as spiritual teacher and healer” to cause the victim to fear harm to herself and others

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fagg, Heaney, Arnold

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.