Skip to main content
· 12/18/2002

United States v. Dale Eyman

Citations

  • 313 F.3d 741
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 26135
  • 2002 WL 31831384

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that an attorney’s decision not to call a particular witness for tactical reasons does not satisfy the standard for ineffective assistance
  • “A district court satisfies its obligation to make the requisite factual findings when it indicates in its written judgment that it is adopting the findings set forth in the PSR.” (emphasis added)
  • \A district court satisfies its obligation to make the requisite factual findings when it indicates in its written judgment that it is adopting the findings set forth in the PSR.\ (emphasis added)
  • \failure to call a witness for tactical reasons of trial strategy does not satisfy the standard for ineffective assistance of counsel\
  • “[F]ailure to call a witness for tactical reasons of trial strategy does not satisfy the standard for ineffective assistance of counsel.”
  • “A failure to call a witness for tactical reasons of trial strategy does not satisfy the standard for ineffective assistance of counsel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oakes, Cabranes, Katzmann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.