Skip to main content
· 5/24/1999

United States v. Da Ping Huang

Citations

  • 178 F.3d 184
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 9988
  • 1999 WL 330419

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting “the remarkable proposition” argued by the defendant that when the government refuses to move for a downward departure because the defendant has not performed under the plea agreement, the defendant should be permitted to withdraw his guilty plea
  • rejecting \the remarkable proposition\ argued by the defendant that when the government refuses to move for a downward departure because the defendant has not performed under the plea agreement, the defendant should be permitted to withdraw his guilty plea
  • “defendant has the burden to establish breach of a plea agreement by a preponderance of the evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greenberg, Roth, Rosenn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.