United States v. Curtis Bernard Minor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the six-year statute of limitations applies to a Fifth Amendment due process claim against a federal agency
• finding jurisdiction to consider the plaintiff's \constitutionally-derived equitable challenge to the administrative forfeiture of the currency under the provisions for general federal question jurisdiction\
• finding jurisdiction to consider the plaintiff 's \constitutionally-derived equitable challenge to the administrative forfeitur e of the currency under the provisions for general federal question jurisdiction\
• court reasoned that because plaintiff sought return of “the very thing” to which he claimed an entitlement, he was not seeking “damages in substitution for a loss”
• since property owner was in federal custody, the DEA notices mailed to his home address and to the Forsyth County jail, where he had been held for a brief period following his arrest, were ineffective
• since property owner was in federal custody, the DEA notices mailed to his home address and to the Forsyth County jail, where he had been held for a brief period following his arrest, were ineffective

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).