United States v. Curtis Arthur Chapel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing revocation based on probationer’s antiwar activities, when sentencing judge had recognized the depth of probationer’s antiwar sentiments but failed to prohibit such activities as condition of probation
• required to work at a certain specified hospital and if work not available there at another charitable institution as directed by the court
• required to work at a certain specified hospital and if work not available there at another charitable institution as directed by the court
• non-criminal acts of protest against Selective Service while on probation for draft offenses could not be used to revoke probation for failing “to obey all laws,” where conditions themselves provided inadequate notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).