United States v. Curtis Adams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• commenting that \[w]e have held on many occasions that prior convictions of firearm offenses are admissible to prove that the defendant had the requisite knowledge and intent to possess a firearm\
• stating evidentiary error is subject to harmless error analysis, which requires a 1 Guzman raised for the first time in his reply brief that the United States failed to provide an appropriate notice under Rule 404(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).