United States v. Curlin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that previously evicted tenant enjoys no expectation of privacy in home
• finding that previously evicted tenant enjoys no expectation of privacy in home
• “[I]ndividuals who occupy a piece of property unlawfully have no claim under the Fourth Amendment.”
• protective sweep of bedroom and walk-in closet reasonable because plaintiff had threatened to barricade himself in and use a gun to resist eviction
• “District courts are required to conduct evidentiary hearings only when a substantial claim is presented and there are disputed issues of material fact that will affect the outcome of the motion [to suppress].”
• “District courts are required to conduct evidentiary hearings only when a substantial claim is presented and there are disputed issues of material fact that will affect the outcome of the motion [to suppress].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).