Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Seventh Circuit· 2/26/2010

United States v. Curby

Citations

  • 595 F.3d 794
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 4028
  • 2010 WL 668883

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deciding that district court did not commit procedural error when it explicitly stated it considered expert opinion, but cited defendant’s criminal history in rejecting below‐guidelines request
  • affirming sen- tence where court’s discussion of mitigation arguments was brief but sentence was at bottom of guideline range
  • affirming sen- tence where court’s discussion of mitigation arguments was brief but sentence was at bottom of guideline range
  • affirming sentence, despite district court’s terse discussion of defendant’s argument in mitigation, where it was “apparent from the record” that court rejected defendant’s plea for leniency “because of his extensive criminal history”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Posner, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.