United States v. Curby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deciding that district court did not commit procedural error when it explicitly stated it considered expert opinion, but cited defendant’s criminal history in rejecting below‐guidelines request
• affirming sen- tence where court’s discussion of mitigation arguments was brief but sentence was at bottom of guideline range
• affirming sen- tence where court’s discussion of mitigation arguments was brief but sentence was at bottom of guideline range
• affirming sentence, despite district court’s terse discussion of defendant’s argument in mitigation, where it was “apparent from the record” that court rejected defendant’s plea for leniency “because of his extensive criminal history”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).