Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 7/1/2005

United States v. Cunningham

Citations

  • 413 F.3d 1199
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 13145
  • 2005 WL 1541074

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the inevitable discovery doctrine where police “had focused their investigation on [two homes], and had drafted an affidavit to support a search warrant for one of these homes,” but stopped pursuing a warrant for the other home based on supposed consent
  • “The inevitable discovery doctrine provides an exception to the exclusionary rule[] and permits evidence to be admitted if an independent, lawful police investigation inevitably would have discovered it.” (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seymour, McWilliams, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.