Tenth Circuit· 7/1/2005
United States v. Cunningham
Citations
- 413 F.3d 1199
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 13145
- 2005 WL 1541074
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying the inevitable discovery doctrine where police “had focused their investigation on [two homes], and had drafted an affidavit to support a search warrant for one of these homes,” but stopped pursuing a warrant for the other home based on supposed consent
- “The inevitable discovery doctrine provides an exception to the exclusionary rule[] and permits evidence to be admitted if an independent, lawful police investigation inevitably would have discovered it.” (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Seymour, McWilliams, Kelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. ChristyTenth Circuit· 2014-01-03· cited 170×
- United States v. BiglowTenth Circuit· 2009-04-20· cited 67×
- United States v. Jerrell HeathSecond Circuit· 2006-07-10· cited 65×
- United States v. MartinezTenth Circuit· 2008-01-15· cited 46×
- United States v. SanchezTenth Circuit· 2010-06-15· cited 38×
- United States v. AlabiD. New Mexico· 2013-04-30· cited 23×
- McDonnell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-05-12· cited 20×
- Miguel Rodriguez v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2015-12-10· cited 18×
- United States v. ChristyD. New Mexico· 2011-09-02· cited 15×
- United States v. RomeroD. New Mexico· 2010-08-20· cited 14×
- United States v. TakaiD. Utah· 2013-04-30· cited 13×
- United States v. MartinezD. New Mexico· 2010-02-25· cited 12×
- United States v. RodriguezD. New Mexico· 2011-12-08· cited 12×
- United States v. NeuginTenth Circuit· 2020-05-01· cited 10×
- United States v. MoraTenth Circuit· 2021-02-24· cited 9×
- United States v. SnyderTenth Circuit· 2015-07-20· cited 8×
- United States v. LoeraD. New Mexico· 2014-10-20· cited 6×
- United States v. PaetschD. Colorado· 2012-10-23· cited 4×
- United States v. Troy AlexanderThird Circuit· 2022-11-30· cited 4×
- United States v. TroxelD. Kansas· 2008-06-17· cited 3×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,080×
- United States v. Merle Ellis OwensTenth Circuit· 1986-01-22· cited 110×
- United States of America, -Appellee v. Larry SouzaTenth Circuit· 2000-08-24· cited 97×
- United States v. Carlos Richard Romero, United States of America v. Joseph Anthony SenaTenth Circuit· 1982-11-04· cited 71×
- United States v. Jose M. CabassaSecond Circuit· 1995-08-11· cited 64×
- United States v. Lewis A. Larsen, A/K/A Louis A. Larsen, A/K/A Jeffrey L. Larsen, A/K/A Jeff Larsen, A/K/A Leland L. LarsenTenth Circuit· 1997-10-21· cited 38×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.