United States v. Cuevas-Andrade

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a reading of the indictment followed by an opportunity given the defendant to ask questions about it will usually fulfill the requirement of Rule 11(b)(1)(G)
• observing “a reading of the indictment, followed by an opportunity given [to] the defendant to ask questions about it, will usually suffice to inform the defendant of the nature of the charge” (citation omitted)
• district court’s failure to personally address the defendant about the nature of the charges and the statutory punishments was harmless because the required information was accurately set forth in the plea agreement and attached factual resume

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).