Skip to main content
· 5/22/1980

United States v. Cryan

Citations

  • 490 F. Supp. 1234
  • 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11365

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A court may not substitute its views or the views of the prosecution for those of the grand jury.”
  • “better rule is that, although the challenged statement alone cannot establish its admissibility against a non-declarant, that statement along with other evidence may establish its admissibility”
  • “A court may not substitute its views or the views of the prosecution for those of the grand jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.