United States v. Cruz-Benitez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that plaintiffs were “only entitled to discovery related to either the named plaintiffs or to company policies to support a motion (not yet filed, much less granted
• noting discovery should be limited to the named plaintiffs and company policies prior to class certification
• denying plaintiffs’ motion to recuse based on fact that judge had “participated on two [educational] panels with defense counsel”
• “Disagreement or dissatisfaction with the Court’s rulings is not enough to succeed on this [recusal] motion.” (brackets in original) (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).