Skip to main content
· 11/18/1871

United States v. Crusell

Citations

  • 79 U.S. 175
  • 20 L. Ed. 384
  • 12 Wall. 175
  • 1870 U.S. LEXIS 1178

Syllabus

<p>1. A continuance granted on an appeal from the Oourt of Claims, there having been a motion made there by the appellant, and yet undisposed of, for a new trial on the ground of after-acquired evidence. But the court declares that it must not be understood as giving any sanction to the idea that indefinite postponement of final hearing and determination can be obtained by repeated motions for continuance here.</p> <p>2. Thexourt below, not this court, must determine whether the application for a new trial is seasonably made.</p>

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.