United States v. Crunk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a government-imposed easement was a temporary taking because the government stated at the outset that the easement would be temporary, and because the easement had ended at the time of the court’s decision
• Army intended to use airfield \only so long as there was a heavy demand for Army helicopter pilots in Vietnam.\
• temporary air facility used for temporary period indicates temporary avigation easement
• finding wartime helicopter training was not intended to be permanent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).