United States v. Crosstown Liquor Mart, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \deem[ing] the portions of Defendants' 7.1(a)(3) statement that are not specifically controverted by Plaintiff to be admitted\
• “deem[ing] the portions of Defendants’ 7.1(a)(3) statement that are not specifically controverted by Plaintiff to be admitted”
• deeming the portions of the defendants’ statement of material facts “that are not specifically controverted by [the p]laintiff to be admitted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).