Skip to main content
· 11/3/1982

United States v. Crooksville Coal Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 560 F. Supp. 141
  • 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18440

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the fact that a motion for summary judgment is unopposed “does not relieve the Court of the task of determining whether a material factual dispute exists”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duncan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.