United States v. Criss E. Duncan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a sentence disparity grounded in differences among offenses to which different defendants pleaded guilty and differences in criminal history is not unwarranted
• holding that a sentence disparity grounded in differences among offenses to which different defendants pleaded guilty and differences in criminal history is not unwarranted
• observing that differences in sentences that result from properly calculated guidelines ranges are not unwarranted disparities
• observing that differences in sentences that result from properly calculated guidelines ranges are not unwarranted disparities
• observing that differences in sentences that result from properly calculated guidelines ranges are not unwarranted disparities
• “Absent a showing of invidious discrimina‐ tion, we shall not second guess a prosecutor’s decision re‐ garding the charges it chooses to bring.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).