United States v. Crippen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a passenger may challenge his seizure at a traffic stop but may not challenge the search of a vehicle
• “We have rejected the contention that counting acquitted conduct as relevant conduct violates a defendant’s due process rights.”
• “A suspicion on the part of police that a person is involved in a drug transaction supports a reasonable belief that the person may be armed and dangerous because weapons and violence are frequently associated with drug transactions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).