Skip to main content
· 12/10/1990

United States v. Crecelius

Citations

  • 751 F. Supp. 1035
  • 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16908
  • 1990 WL 198899

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “a failure to accurately reflect the clearly expressed intent of the sentencing Court”
  • “The First Circuit has not yet had occasion to consider whether a divergence between the sentence a court intended to impose and that which it actually imposed constitutes a ‘clerical error’ within the contemplation of Rule 36”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torres

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.