Skip to main content
· 8/22/1975

United States v. Craney

Citations

  • 23 C.M.A. 519
  • 1 M.J. 142
  • 50 C.M.R. 658
  • 23 USCMA 519
  • 1975 CMA LEXIS 699

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting that failure to retire plaintiff at temporary promotion grade is a matter beyond court’s review
  • stating that plaintiff was bound by the military board’s decision “unless he established that that determination was arbitrary, capricious, contrary to law, or unsupported by substantial evidence”
  • finding jurisdiction to review procedural aspects of a decision of the Secretary of the Army, acting on behalf of the President
  • finding jurisdiction to review procedural aspects of a decision of the Secretary of the Army, acting on behalf of the President
  • finding jurisdiction to review procedural aspects of a decision of the Secretary of the Army, acting on behalf of the President
  • finding jurisdiction to review procedural aspects of a decision of the Secretary of the Army, acting on behalf of the President

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cook, Ferguson, Fletcher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.