· 8/22/1975
United States v. Craney
Citations
- 23 C.M.A. 519
- 1 M.J. 142
- 50 C.M.R. 658
- 23 USCMA 519
- 1975 CMA LEXIS 699
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- suggesting that failure to retire plaintiff at temporary promotion grade is a matter beyond court’s review
- stating that plaintiff was bound by the military board’s decision “unless he established that that determination was arbitrary, capricious, contrary to law, or unsupported by substantial evidence”
- finding jurisdiction to review procedural aspects of a decision of the Secretary of the Army, acting on behalf of the President
- finding jurisdiction to review procedural aspects of a decision of the Secretary of the Army, acting on behalf of the President
- finding jurisdiction to review procedural aspects of a decision of the Secretary of the Army, acting on behalf of the President
- finding jurisdiction to review procedural aspects of a decision of the Secretary of the Army, acting on behalf of the President
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cook, Ferguson, Fletcher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.