Ninth Circuit· 4/6/1971
United States v. Cozzetti
Citations
- 441 F.2d 344
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- fact that operation may appear casual and sporadic because it was terminated after a short time does not remove operation from § 1952 where operation was intended to be profitable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. PolizziNinth Circuit· 1974-04-30· cited 247×
- United States v. Maurice H. Friedman, United States of America v. Manuel JacobsNinth Circuit· 1971-07-16· cited 166×
- United States v. George H. Lustig, United States of America v. Gregory D. PedersonNinth Circuit· 1977-08-12· cited 164×
- United States v. Eugene C. Kirk, Sr.Eighth Circuit· 1976-05-17· cited 157×
- United States v. Aubrey Baker Davis, Jr., A/K/A Junior Baker Davis, A/K/A Baker Davis, and Margaret DavisFifth Circuit· 1982-01-22· cited 143×
- United States v. ValenzuelaNinth Circuit· 1979-03-23· cited 104×
- United States v. KingS.D. California· 1971-11-23· cited 98×
- United States v. WatchmakerEleventh Circuit· 1985-05-30· cited 78×
- United States v. Wayne Donaway, A/K/A Babe DonawayNinth Circuit· 1971-08-27· cited 72×
- United States v. Anthony Nicholas Carrion and Fred SolmorFifth Circuit· 1987-03-27· cited 71×
- United States v. Jack Wilbur Tavelman, United States of America v. Steven JobNinth Circuit· 1981-09-25· cited 66×
- United States v. Joseph John SegnaNinth Circuit· 1977-06-07· cited 60×
- United States v. Harry F. Larson, M.D.Ninth Circuit· 1974-11-21· cited 57×
- United States v. BoldinEleventh Circuit· 1985-09-27· cited 44×
- The United States of America v. Hector G. Camacho, the United States of America v. Jose Dolores RaygozaNinth Circuit· 1976-05-24· cited 43×
- United States v. Harry Nelson Corbin, Jr., United States of America v. Janice Lee RuggieroFourth Circuit· 1981-10-26· cited 42×
- United States v. SmithNinth Circuit· 1979-11-21· cited 41×
- United States v. Giovanni Lignarolo and Mario LignaroloEleventh Circuit· 1985-09-10· cited 40×
- United States v. IsaacsN.D. Illinois· 1972-05-30· cited 40×
- United States v. BergdollD. Delaware· 1976-03-10· cited 38×
Cites
41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 6,512×
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court· 1967-05-29· cited 3,217×
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court· 1950-02-20· cited 2,080×
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1947-06-09· cited 1,370×
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1954-12-06· cited 1,280×
- Vale v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 1,044×
- Trupiano v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-06-14· cited 611×
- Schaffer v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-05-16· cited 474×
- Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1971-02-22· cited 183×
- William Spinelli v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1967-09-12· cited 172×
- Shipley v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 145×
- Clarence Williams and Arlene Jackson v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1969-12-24· cited 112×
- William K. Parker v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1969-01-02· cited 98×
- Turf Center, Inc., Allen, A. Goldberg, Milton Hyatt and Myer Mayor Fox v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1964-01-14· cited 96×
- Von Cleef v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 84×
- Detroit Vital Foods, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1964-10-12· cited 80×
- Bitter v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-10-16· cited 65×
- Francisco S.A. Ignacio and Antonio S.A. Ignacio v. People of the Territory of GuamNinth Circuit· 1969-07-07· cited 63×
- United States v. A. D. AllisonNinth Circuit· 1969-06-17· cited 58×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.