United States v. Counts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the conduct required for auto tampering was a violent felony because it involved a degree of risk similar to auto theft
• holding that the conduct required for auto tampering was a violent felony because it involved a degree of risk similar to auto theft
• applying Johnson to hold auto tampering to be a violent felony for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).