United States v. Coumaris, George

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Booker challenge was “governed by the harmless error standard appropriate for constitutional error”
• stating that Booker challenge was \governed by the harmless error standard appropriate for constitutional error\
• noting, in light of the Court’s remand for resentencing, that reviewing the district court’s application of the guidelines would be “premature at best and unnecessary at worst”
• under post-Booker sentencing regime, “a sentencing court is required ‘to consider Guidelines ranges’ applicable to the defendant” (quoting Booker, 543 U.S. at 245, 125 S.Ct. 738)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).