Skip to main content
· 6/10/2003

United States v. Cory Baker Kamerud, United States of America v. Brett Christian Kamerud

Citations

  • 326 F.3d 1008

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “the government is not required to re-file a notice of enhanced sentence under 21 U.S.C. § 851 after the return of the superseding indictment”
  • \[T]he government is not required to refile a notice of enhanced sentence under 21 U.S.C. § 851 after the return of the superseding indictment.\
  • no improper vouching by asking about agreement to move for downward departure in exchange for truthful testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowman, Arnold, Bye

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.