United States v. Cortez-Hernandez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Government under the CCPA may only garnish 25% of monthly pension benefits
• holding that “[ajlthough restitution orders are generally enforced through the mechanisms established in 18 U.S.C. § 3613 ... courts are further authorized to enforce restitution judgments by all other available and reasonable means” such as the All Writs Act
• “Although the statute in James dealt with indigent criminal defendants, the debts involved — and afforded disparate treatment — were all civil in nature”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).