United States v. Corey Stinefast

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a court cannot assume a link between the defendant's reduced mental capacity and the criminal conduct
• observing that “incorrigibility” may justify sentence well above guidelines range
• affirming sentence where “court’s discussion, while brief, reflects its consid eration and rejection” of the defendant’s arguments
• affirming 216-month sentence, more than five years above 151-month high end of guideline range, because “court’s discussion, while brief, reflects its consideration and rejection of’ argument in mitigation
• affirming 216‐month sentence, more than five years above 151‐month high end of guideline range, because “court’s discussion, while brief, reflects its consideration and 10 No. 15‐3753 rejection of” argument in mitigation
• upholding 216-month sentence where the guideline range was 121 to 151 months

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).