Skip to main content
· 6/12/2014

United States v. Corbert Goldtooth

Citations

  • 754 F.3d 763
  • 2014 WL 2611276

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that advance knowledge “means knowledge at a time the accomplice can do something with it—most notably, opt to walk away.”
  • applying Rosemond's mens rea analysis to the charge of aiding and abetting robbery on an Indian reservation
  • requiring specific intent for attempted robbery within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States under 18 U.S.C. § 2111
  • reversing a conviction for aiding and abetting robbery on an Indian reservation because there was no evidence that the defendants had foreknowledge that the robbery would occur
  • “Mere presence at the scene does not an aider and 26 abettor make.”
  • setting forth the elements of an aiding and abetting offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Noonan, Thomas, Berzon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.