United States v. Copeman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the availability of a remedy in state judicial forfeiture proceedings precludes relief under Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g)
• rejecting the idea that federal prosecution confers constructive possession of property seized by a state, even if the item is not being held as potential evidence in a federal prosecution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).