United States v. Copar Pumice Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that jurisdiction under the Perlman doctrine is limited to only the grand jury context, but declining jurisdiction because the privilege holder was also a party to the litigation
• stating that a privilege holder’s reliance on Perlman in “a civil action where [he] is a party[] is greatly undermined, if not entirely foreclosed, by Mohawk”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).