United States v. Cooperative Theatres of Ohio, Inc. And David Beaupain

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “a horizontal agreement to allocate customers between competing companies is a per se violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act”
• rejecting the argument that an alleged customer allocation conspiracy should not be subjected to per se treatment because it was limited in scope in that it prohibited the conspirators from actively soliciting only certain customers and preserved competition over other customers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).