· 7/1/1858
United States v. Converse
Citations
- 25 F. Cas. 596
- 21 Law Rep. 593
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The Bank of Nova Scotia contends that William F. Kuntz, n, Esquire is not admitted pro hac vice, therefore the subpoena is null____This Court will honor Attorney Kuntz’s admission in the District Court as an admission pro hac vice in the [Superior] Court____”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Curtis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.