Skip to main content
· 9/2/2016

United States v. Contreras-Armendaris

Citations

  • 668 F. App'x 586

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing IIED claim because supervisor’s use of racial, ethnic, and religious slurs “amount to a complaint that [his supervisor] verbally insulted him”
  • denying motion to dismiss a Section 1981 claim based on Pakistani ethnicity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haynes, Higginbotham, Prado

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.