· 9/2/2016
United States v. Contreras-Armendaris
Citations
- 668 F. App'x 586
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dismissing IIED claim because supervisor’s use of racial, ethnic, and religious slurs “amount to a complaint that [his supervisor] verbally insulted him”
- denying motion to dismiss a Section 1981 claim based on Pakistani ethnicity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haynes, Higginbotham, Prado
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.