Skip to main content
· 2/16/1999

United States v. Contents of Account Number Xxxxxxxxx

Citations

  • 36 F. Supp. 2d 614
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1702
  • 1999 WL 92279

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no “excusable neglect” where claimant’s attorney, who had notice of the forfeiture, claimed ignorance of Supplemental Rule C(6)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sweet

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.