Skip to main content
· 9/26/2003

United States v. Consolidation Coal Co. Triangle Wire & Cable, Inc., Third-Party Neville Chemical Co., Third-Party

Citations

  • 345 F.3d 409
  • 34 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20001
  • 57 ERC (BNA) 1161
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 19794
  • 2003 WL 22214142

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deciding, in the context of a contribution action, that “[a]n award of prejudgment interest ... is mandatory”
  • deciding, in the context of a contribution action, that “[a]n award of prejudgment interest . . . is mandatory”
  • noting that court “may consider several [Gore] factors, a few factors, or only one . . . depending on the totality of the circumstances” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Daughtrey, Gilman, Caldwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.