· 9/26/2003
United States v. Consolidation Coal Co. Triangle Wire & Cable, Inc., Third-Party Neville Chemical Co., Third-Party
Citations
- 345 F.3d 409
- 34 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20001
- 57 ERC (BNA) 1161
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 19794
- 2003 WL 22214142
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- deciding, in the context of a contribution action, that “[a]n award of prejudgment interest ... is mandatory”
- deciding, in the context of a contribution action, that “[a]n award of prejudgment interest . . . is mandatory”
- noting that court “may consider several [Gore] factors, a few factors, or only one . . . depending on the totality of the circumstances” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Daughtrey, Gilman, Caldwell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.