United States v. Consolidated Packaging Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[T]he statute [ 18 U.S.C. § 3500 (e)(2) ] does not require production of a statement subsequently prepared no matter how accurate it may be.\
• “If the conspirators could make the conspiracy work and minimize price competition, all conspirators could expect a more profitable survival . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).