United States v. Conrad Albert Krouse, III

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that high-caliber firearms located within easy reach in a room containing drugs were possessed “in furtherance of’ a drug offense
• concluding that § 924(c) “requires proof that the defendant possessed the weapon to promote or facilitate the underlying crime”
• holding that high-caliber firearms located within easy reach in a room containing drugs were possessed “in furtherance of” a drug offense
• stating that “in furtherance of” requires a “sufficient nexus” between the gun and the predicate offense
• agreeing with the core of the other circuits’ analyses but questioning the utility of some of the “Ceballos-Torres factors”
• recognizing limits of factors in certain cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).