Skip to main content
· 12/4/1911

United States v. Congress Construction Co.

Citations

  • 222 U.S. 199
  • 32 S. Ct. 44
  • 56 L. Ed. 163
  • 1911 U.S. LEXIS 1774

Syllabus

<p>Jurisdiction of the Circuit Court is in issue under § 5 of the Judiciary Act of March 3, 1891, c. 517, 26 Stat. 826, whenever- the power of the court to hear and determine the cause as defined or limited by the Constitution or statutes of the United States is in controversy; and- that covers a case where the jurisdiction of the particular Circuit Court is questioned under the statute prescribing the form and place of the action.</p> <p>Under the Materialmen Act of August 13, 1894, c. 280, 28 Stat. 278, as amended February 24, 1905, c. 778, 33 Stat. 811, an action for performance of a bond given under-such act can only be instituted in the district in which the contract was to be performed.</p> <p>A provision in a statute prescribing that an action shall only be brought in a particular district operates pro tanto to displace the provisions upon that subject in the General Jurisdiction Act of 1884, 25 Stat. 433, c. 866.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dealt with the Heard Act, predecessor to the Miller Act, statutory limitation nearly identical

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Devanter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.