United States v. Concepcion Sablan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the word “involved” as a basis for distinguishing the FDPA from the ACCA, and noting “[t]his [was] the distinction that Higgs relied on”
• rejecting the word “involved” as a basis for distinguishing the FDPA from the ACCA, and noting “[t]his [was] the distinction that Higgs relied on”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).