United States v. Concepcion Picciotto

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a policy that adds a requirement not found in the relevant statute and regulation is a substantive rule that is invalid unless it is promulgated with notice and comment
• reversing the conviction of the defendant demonstrator because the relevant NPS regulation was not adopted in conformity with the APA’s procedural requirements
• “This court has previously found agency rules explaining ambiguous terms in statutes and regulations to be interpretive.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).