D. New Jersey· 2/1/2000
United States v. Compaction Systems Corp.
Citations
- 88 F. Supp. 2d 339
- 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14426
- 1999 WL 1125224
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \Mere disagreement with a court's decision normally should be raised through the appellate process and is inappropriate on a motion for [reconsideration].\
- “Mere disagreement with a court’s decision normally should be raised through the appellate process and is inappropriate on a motion for [reconsideration].”
- “Mere disagreement with a court’s decision normally should be raised through the appellate process and is inappropriate on a motion for [reconsideration].”
- “Mere disagreement with a court’s decision normally should be raised through the appellate process and is inappropriate on a motion for [reconsideration].”
- “[M]ere disagreement with a court’s decision normally should be raised through the appellate process and is inappropriate on a motion for reargument.”
- “Mere disagreement with a court's decision normally should be raised through the appellate process and is inappropriate on a motion for [reconsideration].”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hedges
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Interfaith Community Organization v. Honeywell International, Inc.D. New Jersey· 2002-07-26· cited 86×
- Rich v. StateD. New Jersey· 2018-02-06· cited 70×
- Andreyko ex rel. Estate of Andreyko v. Sunrise Senior Living, Inc.D. New Jersey· 2014-01-24· cited 61×
- CPS MedManagement LLC v. Bergen Regional Medical Center, L.P.D. New Jersey· 2013-04-05· cited 50×
- Fellenz v. Lombard Investment Corp.D. New Jersey· 2005-10-18· cited 42×
- Aviall Services, Inc. v. Cooper Industries, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2001-08-14· cited 29×
- Clark v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaD. New Jersey· 2013-04-18· cited 28×
- Summerfield v. Equifax Information Services LLCD. New Jersey· 2009-09-30· cited 23×
- Bryan v. ShahD. New Jersey· 2005-01-10· cited 22×
- Yurecko v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp.D. New Jersey· 2003-08-18· cited 21×
- Major Tours, Inc. v. ColorelD. New Jersey· 2011-10-11· cited 20×
- Red Roof Franchising LLC v. AA Hospitality Northshore, LLCD. New Jersey· 2013-03-28· cited 19×
- S.C. v. Deptford Township Board of EducationD. New Jersey· 2003-03-14· cited 18×
- CHAMPION LABORATORIES, INC. v. Metex Corp.D. New Jersey· 2010-01-04· cited 9×
- Lenox Inc. v. Reuben Smith Rubbish RemovalD. New Jersey· 2000-04-04· cited 7×
- Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. City of Lodi, Cal.E.D. California· 2003-12-22· cited 6×
- Cataldo v. MosesD. New Jersey· 2004-11-03· cited 6×
- New York v. Solvent Chemical Co.W.D. New York· 2003-02-27· cited 4×
- Grossberger v. SalduttiD. New Jersey· 2011-10-05· cited 2×
- Aviall Services Inc v. Cooper Indust IncFifth Circuit· 2001-08-14· cited 1×
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationThird Circuit· 1974-04-09· cited 637×
- Key Tronic Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 558×
- MEYER, Joseph W., Appellant v. RIEGEL PRODUCTS CORPORATION and James River Corporation of VirginiaThird Circuit· 1983-11-29· cited 364×
- United States v. Alcan Aluminum Corp.Third Circuit· 1992-05-14· cited 243×
- New Castle County Rhone-Poulenc, Inc., Zeneca, Inc. v. Halliburton Nus CorpThird Circuit· 1997-06-03· cited 168×
- Undray D. Ford, Etc. v. Ernie ElsburyFifth Circuit· 1994-10-20· cited 127×
- United States v. KramerD. New Jersey· 1991-02-08· cited 117×
- Unnamed caseFirst Circuit· 1994-05-25· cited 108×
- New Jersey Turnpike Authority v. Ppg Industries, IncThird Circuit· 1999-11-22· cited 82×
- Bermingham v. Sony Corp. of America, Inc.D. New Jersey· 1993-03-19· cited 78×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1996-09-27· cited 77×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1997-06-13· cited 73×
- In Re Acushnet River & New Bedford Harbor: Proceedings Re Alleged PCB PollutionD. Massachusetts· 1989-04-27· cited 60×
- United States v. New Castle CountyD. Delaware· 1986-07-17· cited 47×
- Transtech Industries, Inc. v. a & Z SEPTIC CLEAND. New Jersey· 1992-07-30· cited 43×
- Damiano v. Sony Music Entertainment, Inc.D. New Jersey· 1997-08-20· cited 37×
- Tippins Incorporated v. Usx CorporationThird Circuit· 1994-09-12· cited 36×
- City of New York v. Exxon Corp.S.D. New York· 1990-08-06· cited 36×
- Rent Stabilization Ass'n of New York City, Inc. v. HigginsSupreme Court· 1994-06-13· cited 31×
- United States v. EmmonsTenth Circuit· 1997-02-18· cited 28×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.