· 11/27/1989
United States v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Citations
- 890 F.2d 507
- 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 17709
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- review of district court’s ultimate finding on contempt should be conducted with deference to the court’s “intimate understanding of the history and circumstances of th[e] litigation”
- “[WJhile the Commonwealth has not complied with the decree’s staffing ratios, the district court was within its discretion in determining that such non-compliance does not constitute contempt.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Campbell, Timbers, Torruella
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.