United States v. Columbus Ewings

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Spending sprees, like other evidence of pecuniary gain, tend to show participation in Nos. 06-2680, 06-2963 & 06-3114 9 crimes where financial enrichment is the motive.”
• merely because extraneous facts are alleged in indictment does not render proof of those facts relevant and admissible at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).