United States v. Colorado Supreme Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Colorado rule equivalent to Rule 3.8(e) applied to federal prosecutors
• relying on section 530B to uphold an ethics rule consisting of subparagraph (1) but without any provision for an adversarial hearing
• noting state laws and rules contemplated by the Amendment are “state professional rules” or “rule[s] of professional ethics”
• noting that “this appeal . . . presents purely legal questions”
• noting that “this appeal . . . presents purely legal questions”
• noting that “this appeal ... presents purely legal questions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).