United States v. Collazo-Castro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Fourth Amendment does not require a warrant based on an oath or affirmation to revoke an individual on supervised release
• holding that neither § 3583(i) nor the Fourth Amendment require a warrant based on an oath or affirmation to revoke an individual on supervised release
• con-cluding that “Fourth Amendment does not require a warrant based on oath or affirmation to revoke an individual on supervised release”
• \We conclude that the Fourth Amendment does not require a warrant based on an oath or affirmation to revoke an individual on supervised release.\
• “We conclude that the Fourth Amendment does 10 No. 18-2128 not require a warrant based on an oath or affirmation to re- voke an individual on supervised release.”
• “We conclude that the Fourth Amendment does 10 No. 18-2128 not require a warrant based on an oath or affirmation to re- voke an individual on supervised release.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).